log in | register | forums
Show:
Go:
Forums
Username:

Password:

User accounts
Register new account
Forgot password
Forum stats
List of members
Search the forums

Advanced search
Recent discussions
- Git client updated to 0.07 (News:1)
- Archive Edition 27:1 reviewed (News:)
- Rougol April 2024 meeting on monday is Anniversary time (News:1)
- WROCC April 2024 meeting o...changes to our phone lines (News:1)
- April developer 'fireside' chat is on saturday night (News:)
- March 2024 News Summary (News:4)
- WROCC Newsletter Volume 41:11 reviewed (News:)
- WROCC March 2024 meeting o... Hughes and Peter Richmond (News:1)
- Rougol March 2024 meeting on monday with Bernard Boase (News:)
- Drag'n'Drop 13i2 edition reviewed (News:)
Related articles
- Firefox released for RISC OS 5 [Updated]
- Castle Up For Grabs
- Wakefield 2006 show report
- Wakey Wakey, it's show time again!
- Rounding Up February
- RISC OS South East Show 2005
- Wakefield 2001 show report
- Wakefield 2002 show report
- Wakefield 2005 show report (pictures)
- Wakefield 2004 show report
Latest postings RSS Feeds
RSS 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9
Atom 0.3
Misc RDF | CDF
 
View on Mastodon
@www.iconbar.com@rss-parrot.net
Site Search
 
Article archives
The Icon Bar: News and features: Oregano2 gets a release
 

Oregano2 gets a release

Posted by Andrew Poole on 12:47, 7/3/2003 | , ,
 
At last, the time has come and Oregano2 is now available to buy from the Castle website.

John Ballance broke the news on the Oregano smartgroup last night. And, as promised in the posting, a demo version is now available to download.

After about an hour playing with it, it seems like a very nice web browser to use, and seems faster than its predecessor. One major problem is that the scrollbars simply don't work, leaving you no option but to drag the page round, although you should get used to that after a while.
 

  Oregano2 gets a release
  takkaria (17:12 7/3/2003)
  monkeyson2 (17:18 7/3/2003)
    Horse (17:57 7/3/2003)
      moss (18:40 7/3/2003)
        Wookie (21:10 7/3/2003)
          takkaria (22:38 7/3/2003)
            The Doctor (08:10 8/3/2003)
              vshears (12:01 8/3/2003)
                ad (12:50 8/3/2003)
                  ad (15:35 8/3/2003)
                    andypoole (19:51 8/3/2003)
                      ad (20:00 8/3/2003)
                        Phlip (08:33 9/3/2003)
                          John Goldsworthy (15:22 9/3/2003)
                            moss (15:33 9/3/2003)
                              moss (15:34 9/3/2003)
                                John Campbell Rees (19:46 9/3/2003)
                                  ad (20:16 9/3/2003)
                                    Jeff (16:03 10/3/2003)
                                      moss (17:59 10/3/2003)
                                        Vic Shears (12:15 12/3/2003)
 
Andrew Sidwell Message #91911, posted by takkaria at 17:12, 7/3/2003
Member
Posts: 324
I'd suggest a rephrasing of the last sentence from "One major problem, being that the scrollbars, simply don't work, leaving..." to "One major problem is that the scrollbars simply don't work, leaving...", as the former, simply doesn't work.

(spot the deliberate mistake)

andy/takka.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Phil Mellor Message #91912, posted by monkeyson2 at 17:18, 7/3/2003, in reply to message #91911
monkeyson2Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler

Posts: 12380
I've given it a trim. :)
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Horse Message #91913, posted at 17:57, 7/3/2003, in reply to message #91912
Unregistered user Why doesn't someone just port KHTML? It's been done for Mac OS X (Carbon) and even AtheOS, and the Safari work should make it even easier. Throw in KJS and other associated technologies and you've something in the same league as other platforms.

Just don't integrate it Microsoft-style with the operating system, Castle, or you'll be poking another wasps' nest with a big licence controversy stick. :-)

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Hoare Message #91914, posted by moss at 18:40, 7/3/2003, in reply to message #91913

Posts: 9348
Well, Peter Naulls was doing something with Konqueror as part of his Unix Porting Project - see this:

http://www.chocky.org/unix/browser.html

Don't know the current state of it, because I can't afford to resubscribe at the moment :-(

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Wookie Message #91915, posted by Wookie at 21:10, 7/3/2003, in reply to message #91914
Member
Posts: 2
Well the cookie handling seems better, now the cookie from my favourite site (www.g503.com) works correctly so I'll be upgrading :-)
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Andrew Sidwell Message #91916, posted by takkaria at 22:38, 7/3/2003, in reply to message #91915
Member
Posts: 324
"Why doesn't someone just port KHTML?"

Go on then, port it.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
The Doctor Message #91917, posted at 08:10, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #91916
Unregistered user Yeah, it sounds easy when you say it fast like that ;-)
I think Peter Naulls was planning to port Konqueror but has now decided to port the graphics enabled version of Links (Lynx?) web browser first.
www.chocky.org/unix (though I don't seem to be able to get there at the moment - probably the cacky internet connection we have at work)
Should be re-subscribing to it when I get paid next week :P
Cheers!
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
vshears Message #91918, posted at 12:01, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #91917
Unregistered user I have downloaded the Demo of O2 and it has certainly been developed considerably from the first demo made avilable late 2001.

Sdaly however there is still no sign of a search within page facility (somthing I need to use regularily).

I also note that the with this demo that cliking on URL's in postings in Plout does not seem to start a page fetch?.

In spite of this I have sent of my order for the upgrade. Hoping that that will show some inprovement.

Vic

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Andrew Duffell Message #91919, posted by ad at 12:50, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #91918

Posts: 3262
I seem to have some redraw problems with the demo :|
Does anyone know if the real thing has the same problems??
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Andrew Duffell Message #91920, posted by ad at 15:35, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #91919

Posts: 3262
*looks a buttons on O2*

hmmm....

*looks at NetSurf throbber*

hmmm....

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Andrew Poole Message #91921, posted by andypoole at 19:51, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #91920
andypoole
Mouse enthusiast
Web
Twitter

Posts: 5558
The Oregano2 ones were made first :p
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Andrew Duffell Message #91922, posted by ad at 20:00, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #91921

Posts: 3262
damn ;)
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Phlip Message #91923, posted at 08:33, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #91922
Unregistered user "Why doesn't someone just pr0t Gecko?"
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Goldsworthy Message #91924, posted at 15:22, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #91923
Unregistered user Why doesnt just go full the full whack and port windows?
Why doesnt someone port unix?
Why dosent someone port Mac OS?
Why doesnt someone port XP?

Why don't more ppl learn how to port rather than offering suggestions which have already been discussed else where.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Hoare Message #91925, posted by moss at 15:33, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #91924

Posts: 9348
To be fair, suggestions of porting things often come from users; and they often come in the form of "Why" rather than "PORT IT! NOW!", even if they could be a bit more polite, and are very naive.

Developers sometimes forget there is a user base out there who simply don't want to program, or don't have time.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Hoare Message #91926, posted by moss at 15:34, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #91925

Posts: 9348
(And before Chocky arrives - an ideal way for users to help porting is by signing up to his excellent Unix Porting Project ;-))
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Campbell Rees Message #91927, posted at 19:46, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #91926
Unregistered user This is the best browser I have used on RISC OS. No question about it.

I am hopuing that Castle will have the manual sent out as soon as possible. Little tips like fast scrolling by holding the mouse pointer at the top or bottom of the page are things that should be told about.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Andrew Duffell Message #91928, posted by ad at 20:16, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #91927

Posts: 3262
That scrolling thing is irritating. They should make iy so you have to hold a mouse button down aswell.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeff Message #91929, posted at 16:03, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #91928
Unregistered user The scrolling is a disaster. The whole point of the vertical scroll bar is so that you can see how big the document is in relation to what you can see. If you want to go straight to the bottom you have to wait for it to scroll through the whole document. Nope - a big fat zero out of ten for that misfeature.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Hoare Message #91930, posted by moss at 17:59, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #91929

Posts: 9348
I'm sure they'll add that facility in time - remember, there's good reasons why it isn't there (it's not needed in Oregan's original product). I'm sure Castle will add it at some point.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Vic Shears Message #91931, posted at 12:15, 12/3/2003, in reply to message #91930
Unregistered user While I agree that the current scroll bar situation is far from ideal (or even far from nice) Oregano 2 as it is usable.

For instance you do not actually have to wait for it to scroll all the way through to get to the end of a long page the keyboard shortcut "Ctrl End" will accomplish that.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 

The Icon Bar: News and features: Oregano2 gets a release