With all the excitement this morning when
Castle Technology announced the
IYONIX PC,
Peter "Chocky" Naulls has written an
article on
riscos.info about RISC OS and 32 bit technology and how it all came about.
In his article, Peter explains "There has been a great deal of confusion over 32-bit in RISC OS over recent months Not least, because of its technical nature, and secondly, because of the spin put on it by various parties."
So why not head on over to the article on riscos.info and find out what 32 bits can do for the RISC OS world.
Source: Drobe
|
32 bit RISC OS Explained |
|
mfrissen (17:45 17/10/2002) takkaria (18:17 17/10/2002) takkaria (19:28 17/10/2002) pnaulls (09:05 18/10/2002) epistaxsis@work:( (11:24 18/10/2002) Timothy609 (18:04 27/10/2002)
|
|
Marco Frissen |
Message #91338, posted by mfrissen at 17:45, 17/10/2002 |
Posts: 173
|
as usual, Peter describes the issue detailed, but understandable for the not-too-geeky among us. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Andrew Sidwell |
Message #91339, posted by takkaria at 18:17, 17/10/2002, in reply to message #91338 |
Member
Posts: 324
|
"IYONIX PC which boasts RISC OS 5 and 32 bits" What are you on about? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Andrew Sidwell |
Message #91340, posted by takkaria at 19:28, 17/10/2002, in reply to message #91339 |
Member
Posts: 324
|
Shame you can't delete articles you posted. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Peter Naulls |
Message #91341, posted by pnaulls at 09:05, 18/10/2002, in reply to message #91340 |
Member
Posts: 317
|
takk so silly |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
keith dunlop |
Message #91342, posted by epistaxsis@work:( at 11:24, 18/10/2002, in reply to message #91341 |
Member
Posts: 7
|
Thanking you Mr. Naulls for a nice doc. Looks much more hopeful. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Tim Firmager |
Message #91343, posted by Timothy609 at 18:04, 27/10/2002, in reply to message #91342 |
Member
Posts: 42
|
Sounds great...no honest it does but when will it be released 1 year? 2 years? (doubtful hopefully) all i can say is good luck to them :) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
|